Many electron atoms - part 3 |
We started by reviewing the variational approach to Schrödinger "derivation", how to justify that only one variation of phi appears, and only on "the left side". The usual argument is that - if formulated with integrals - the Phi and Phi* are two independent variable functions, so that we must consider variation of both - and we start with the variation of the Phi* - or in Dirac notation - the < | vector. And that already brings the desired result, we do not need to continue to the condition for Phi |
0010_Variational_derivation.png
0010_Variational_derivation.png |
Applying the same to variation of many-electron energy Notation issues: 1. Variation of the whole function - all the occurencies of e.g. alpha must be replaced by its variation i.e. for all position variables rk - and because of the overlaps-conditions only the terms indicated below remain nonzero 2. Variation of terms including the two-paricle operators - we do not have a simple notation < a b | V(1,2) | c d > is the double - integral < b | V(1,2) | d > - one of the variables, say 2, is not integrated over so that G(1) = < b | V(1,2) | d > This has been discussed in the following slides |
0020_Meaning_of_the_notation.png
0020_Meaning_of_the_notation.png |
< a b | V(1,2) | c d > denotes the double - integral < b | V(1,2) | d > - one of the variables, say 2, is not integrated over so that G(1) = < b | V(1,2) | d > perhaps we should use ( b | V(1,2) | d ) - to indicate that it is not the same as the This has been discussed in detail here in this slide - in the colored part REMINDER OF THE Hartree - Method - interaction with the charged cloud |
0030_Connection_with_Hartree_method.png
0030_Connection_with_Hartree_method.png |
The details of the Hartree-Fock equations - best seen with the notation with integrals The direct term is simple The exchange term - note the summation Non-locality of the exchange term |
0043_exchange.png
0043_exchange.png |
Non-locality of the exchange term Hand-written part - what is non-local operator we start with the superposition statement and show the origin of the unit-operator relation including the projection operators | a > < a | |
0050_Local_nonLocal.png
0050_Local_nonLocal.png |
Unit operator - containing projection operators | a > < a | Generalized to eigenstates of position integrals - and delta-functions involved What follows: basically all operators should be non-local; our favourit multiplication operations, as the discussed potential operation contain the delta - function The exchange potential appears by construction non-local Solution of Hartree- Fock equations - they contain "integro-differential equations" for the orbitals Usually some further approximations |
0060_Local_nonLocal.png
0060_Local_nonLocal.png |
Next time - (a) DFT - density functional theory (b) configuration mixing (c) spectroscopic terms - notation of L S J states (angular momentum, spin, and total J ) |