|
The previous lecture about the variational method assumed a product function, i.e. independent electron. Hylleraas proposed a function which can not be factorized as a product of two functions of the two coordinates Not independent - therefore correlated somewhat surprising implementation of the correlation - see below |
0005_HYLLERAAS.png
0005_HYLLERAAS.png |
Not independent - therefore correlated somewhat surprising implementation of the correlation constructing expressions of the two variables First we explore the product and not product - already a sum of two or more products is NOT a single product |
0010.png
0010.png |
Last idea above: the simple "correlation" could be a function of the DISTANCE between the two electrons. Just the simple f(x) discussed, where x is the indicated distance between 1 and 2 would be a good first step - suppressing the wavefunction as x --> 0 (simulating repulsion) This is indeed one of Hylleraas' extra variables; Hylleraas used 6 variational parameters - as illustrated Later, with computers arriving: The best calculations used up to 1023 variational parameters and obtained great accuracy in comparison with experiments |
0020_HYLLERAAS.png
0020_HYLLERAAS.png |
Correlation by configuration mixing This idea could follow from the above consideration of sum of products, but it follows also quite formally from the expansion theorem as illustrated They cn be obtained by linear algebrahe unknown coefficiens d below are not searched by a particular variational method, since they are linear - they can be obtained by DIAGONALIZATION - the well known method to find eigenvalues |
0040_Configuration_mixing_--Expansion_eigenfunctions.png
0040_Configuration_mixing_--Expansion_eigenfunctions.png |
Configuration mixing visualization - for 2 electrons - and for "many" electrons (i.e.4) |
0050_Configuration_mixing.png
0050_Configuration_mixing.png |
Exchange interaction - consider the TRIPLET and SINGLET as before, but now we really evaluate the expectation values of the hamiltonian We first show the normalization Then how the many terms ( 12 terms with the factoring of H into H1, H2 and V12 ) reduce to 4 terms where the last one is the "exchange term" - leading to the exchange interaction 1. normalization - and the H1, H2 behaving as in the normalization evaluation - factors 2 cancel |
0060_origin_exchange_interaction.png
0060_origin_exchange_interaction.png |
above - the terms are shown, but without the normalization; there is no
orthogonality in the V12 case Exchange interaction - see the difference between singlet and triplet, normalization included 2. triplet, singlet explicitely |
0070_origin_exchange_interaction.png
0070_origin_exchange_interaction.png |
Exchange interaction 3. summary - SINGLET - TRIPLET difference now from a formal expression |
0080_triplet--singlet_exchange_interaction.png
0080_triplet--singlet_exchange_interaction.png |
Doubly excited states of Helium the previously discussed orthohelium - parahelium states - only one electron excited, as indicated if both orbitals are excited states - the resulting state probably has the same energy as "continuum states", i.e. such states that one electron is bound and the other escabed - free |
0110_Double_excited_states.png
0110_Double_excited_states.png |
The original version (a textbook) of our above picture |
0120_Double_excited_states.png
0120_Double_excited_states.png |
Schematics of Autoinization, Auger process and electron-scattering resonances (resonance - enhancement fora particular frequency - in Q.M. - a particular energy ) |
0130_Double_excited_Autoionization.png
0140_Double_excited_Auger.png
0130_Double_excited_Autoionization.png 0140_Double_excited_Auger.png |
Another schematics of autoinization - doubly excited states - LATER in the course: non-radiative processes |
0150_Double_excited_schematic.png
0150_Double_excited_schematic.png |
Exchange interaction --> effective spin-spin interaction Purely formally, as far as the electrons are in given orbitals, the energy difference between singlet and triplet can be formalized as an "effective spin-spin interaction" - favoring the parallel spins - as shown below |
0160_Spin-Spin.png
0160_Spin-Spin.png |
Exchange interaction --> effective spin-spin interaction Purely formally, as far as the electrons are in given orbitals, the energy difference between singlet and triplet can be formalized as an "effective spin-spin interaction" - favoring the parallel spins - as shown here But it turns out that exactly this is the correlation leading to FERROMAGNETISM in certain solid state materials |
0163_Spin-Spin.png
0163_Spin-Spin.png |
Exchange interaction -- this is the correlation leading to FERROMAGNETISM in certain solid state materials - final arguments |
0165_Spin-Spin.png
0165_Spin-Spin.png |
... and we started to look at Many electron atoms --> NEXT TOPIC |